# Mercury performance

**URL:** https://talk.remobjects.com/t/mercury-performance/23019
**Category:** Mercury
**Created:** [September 3, 2020, 11:28pm UTC](https://talk.remobjects.com/t/mercury-performance/23019 "2020-09-03T23:28:19Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![aolson](https://talk.remobjects.com/user_avatar/talk.remobjects.com/aolson/32/11707_2.png) [@aolson](https://talk.remobjects.com/u/aolson)
#### Post date: [September 3, 2020, 11:28pm UTC](https://talk.remobjects.com/t/mercury-performance/23019/1 "2020-09-03T23:28:19Z")

</div>

Have you done any performance tests comparing mercury compiled code vs vb compiled code? Just curious

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mh](https://talk.remobjects.com/user_avatar/talk.remobjects.com/mh/32/18050_2.png) [@mh](https://talk.remobjects.com/u/mh)
#### Post date: [September 4, 2020, 12:33pm UTC](https://talk.remobjects.com/t/mercury-performance/23019/2 "2020-09-04T12:33:47Z")

</div>

Mercury will perform just like all the other Elements languages, on the respective platform. On .NET, i’d expect no noticeable difference between [VB.NET](http://VB.NET), VC#, and Elements (given reasonable code).